Estudio analítico y comparativo del contenido noticioso de los portales digitales de los diarios El Telégrafo y El Universo sobre el caso Odebrecht-Glas, a partir de criterios de calidad, del 2 de septiembre al 2 de octubre de 2017.

Abstract

The general purpose of this investigation was to compare the treatment given to the news content on the digital portals from El Telégrafo and El Universo, about the Odebrecht-Glas’ case, published between September 2° and October 2° of 2017 based on quality criteria. The methodology used was a mixed investigation with quality and quantitative information collection techniques to evaluate the news published in both portals; the investigation techniques were the content analysis of 68 news and interviews realized to experts and journalists of every media. In conclusion it was determined the existence of a common factor the lack of balance in the news of both digital portals. El Universo’s diary doesn’t comply with this principle on a 33%, meanwhile El Telégrafo’s diary doesn’t comply with a 51%. On the other side it is important to mention that both diaries comply mostly with the rest of the studied quality criteria. The journalists of every media affirmed that the biggest obstacle that appears in the journalistic exercise is the search of trustworthy information sources for news development. Also, experts considered that the lack of access to truthful information sources is due to the lack of time, since the immediacy in which the news must be published doesn’t give them pertinent space for a thorough investigation.