La prueba en el proceso de prescripción extraordinaria adquisitiva de dominio.

Abstract

The evidence in procedural law usually we have to prove what we affirm or deny, what we propose in a lawsuit, regardless the type of it; that’s why the evidence is the center of the whole process; considering it is the one that allows the judge to form a criteria to be able to resolve and motivate his sentence; the evidence is the spine of a lawsuit or a response to the lawsuit, Therefore, knowing what, how and when to announce and reproduce it in a judicial process becomes sine qua non for success in a process, which is why not being clear about the means of proof and how to develop it in the oral system would become really essential in the training of a legal professional and knowing about the conduct of judges at the right procedural moment to be able to administer justice in relation to the introduction of evidence is a nuisance. In such manner, the evidence within a process serves as the fundamental foundation to be able to execute a good judicial process, of whatever the process was, however, it is necessary to take into consideration that the processes of Extraordinary Acquisitive Domain Prescription, the precepts that we must be demonstrated with evidence according to the jurisprudence are three sine qua non requirements that will be analyzed in this research. This work will be carried out by carrying out an explanatory investigation, which not only seeks to describe a problem, but also combines an analytical and synthetic method with deductive and inductive methods, with which we will answer the reason for the importance of expert evidence in a process of extraordinary acquisition prescription of domain, in application with the General Organic Code of Processes