Estudio comparativo de los principales prejuicios en torno al psicoanálisis y cognitivo-conductual como métodos de tratamiento al síntoma psíquico.

Abstract

The purpose of the work was to establish a comparative study of the main prejudices around psychoanalysis and cognitive-behavioral as methods of treatment for psychic discomfort, its importance to collect and discard erroneous ideas that exist in psychology with respect to time, evidence and results. results that detrimentally influence the orientation of students and patients when choosing a treatment method. Its objectives were to analyze the main prejudices of psychoanalysis and cognitive behavior in students and patients through the use of surveys. An analysis and clarification was requested from the 4 experts of each orientation through interviews, the methodology is a qualitative method. Within the results of the surveys, we obtained the prejudices of psychoanalysis, which were that there are "limitations in its scientific bases." While the cognitive behavioral have "superficial changes" and "The directness with which I know has to handle." It was concluded that psychoanalysis has scientific limitations, unlike cognitive behavioral. For both, time is a variable that affects speed. Analysis has little recognition. The similarity in both positions is that it is difficult to completely eliminate symptomatic manifestations and in cognitive behavioral therapy it is necessary to maintain order and objectives while psychoanalysis does not aim at objectivity.