El daño al Proyecto de Vida como elemento de la Reparación Integral.

Abstract

In 1998, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights put forward the concept of the life project and the damage to it for the first time. Despite this and various judgments by the Court itself that have considered it as an element within the integral non-pecuniary reparation, the Court has not granted it a specific definition, leaving it as an indeterminate legal term. In turn, the doctrine has given it certain parameters, but like the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, it has not been able to wield a concise scope of the damage to the life project. Ecuadorian legislation has included the damage to the life project in various legal bodies, but it has also failed to give it a concrete definition, as a result the judges have limited their application, so legislative and jurisprudential development of the subject is vital so that a complete integral reparation can be offered to the victims.